Writing Plan Phases
Collecting Baseline Data
First Edition Writing Plan
Second Edition Writing Plan
  • phase completed
  • phase in-progress

The Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences (SLHS), in the College of Liberal Arts offers internationally-recognized programs in speech-language-hearing sciences, audiology, and speech-language pathology that provide outstanding opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students to pursue rewarding and meaningful careers.

Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Writing Plan

Expand all

Writing in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences

In the Second-Edition Writing Plan, the discipline-specific writing characteristics established in the First-Edition Writing Plan remain integral and unchanged. These characteristics are essential for effective communication in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences (SLHS) and continue to guide the department's teaching and assessment of writing. These key characteristics include:

Precision and Clarity: Effective communication in SLHS demands precision and clarity in conveying complex concepts and data, both orally and in writing. This involves using accurate terminology, defining key terms, and presenting information clearly and concisely that is easily understood by diverse audiences.

Evidence-Based Practice: Writing in SLHS reflects a rigorous evaluation of empirical research, scholarly literature, and clinical evidence. Effective communication in this field involves synthesizing information and supporting arguments and practices with well-rounded evidence.

Professionalism and Ethical Considerations: SLHS professionals must uphold high standards of professionalism and adhere to ethical guidelines. This includes maintaining confidentiality, respecting privacy and cultural sensitivity, and using empathetic, respectful, and nonjudgmental language when discussing individuals with communication disorders.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Given the interdisciplinary nature of SLHS, professionals often collaborate with counterparts from related fields. Effective communication is indispensable in bridging disciplinary divides and fostering fruitful collaboration. Professionals should be adept at engaging with colleagues from various fields and remain open to new perspectives to facilitate productive interdisciplinary discussions.

Audience Adaptation: Effective communication in SLHS requires tailoring messages to the needs and backgrounds of different audiences. Whether addressing clients, families, colleagues, educators, or policymakers, professionals must adapt their communication style to effectively convey their message.

Writing Conventions: Academic and professional writing in SLHS follows specific conventions, such as APA style, to ensure consistency, clarity, and credibility in scholarly and professional documents.

Writing Abilities Expected of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Majors

Students in the Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences (SLHS) major are expected to graduate with strong writing abilities that enable them to communicate effectively in various academic and professional contexts. Based on the faculty's articulated categories of desired writing abilities for the SLHS major, here are the key aspects to focus on:

Address specific readers intentionally and sensitively: SLHS students are expected to demonstrate the ability to adapt their writing to meet the needs and expectations of specific readers within the field. By intentionally and sensitively addressing specific readers, students will enhance their communication skills, promote understanding, and contribute to effective knowledge dissemination in the speech-language-hearing sciences.

Describe processes, sites, and data: Students should be able to express their ideas clearly and concisely, using appropriate language and terminology specific to the field of SLHS. This includes communicating complex concepts in a straightforward manner and avoiding unnecessary jargon or technical language that may hinder understanding.

Make a persuasive recommendation: Students are expected to demonstrate the skills necessary to make persuasive recommendations in the SLHS field. They will learn to support their recommendations with pertinent scientific, economic, or sociocultural perspectives, while demonstrating critical thinking and logical reasoning in their written communication.

Make and provide evidence for claims: Students in SLHS should demonstrate the ability to make clear and testable claims, substantiate those claims with credible evidence, and analyze and interpret the data or findings. They should effectively incorporate visuals, correctly scale them, and appropriately cite sources to support their claims and insights.

Organize contents logically: Students in SLHS should be able to organize text based on scientific processes and categories. They need to discriminate between empirical and theoretical evidence, summarize consistencies and inconsistencies in the literature, and facilitate logical comprehension and idea evolution.

Revise and proofread: Students are expected to produce well-structured sentences and coherent paragraphs while demonstrating command of standard grammar and punctuation. Rigorous revision and
proofreading are essential for ensuring clarity, consistency, and overall quality in their writing.

By acquiring these writing abilities, students in the SLHS major will be well-prepared to communicate effectively in academic and professional settings, produce high-quality research and clinical documents, and succeed in their future careers as speech-language pathologists and audiologists as well as in other related fields.

Menu of Grading Criteria Used in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Courses

The SLHS faculty generated the following menu of criteria, based on the list of writing abilities members prioritize in working with student writers in their courses. One major challenge for faculty/instructors is to adapt and tailor these criteria based on their specific instructional objectives and assignment requirements. Regular communication and feedback between faculty and students can help address any concerns and ensure that grading practices align with the desired writing abilities and goals of the SLHS program.

SLHS Writing AbilitiesSLHS Grading Criteria (with explanatory comments)
1. Intentionally and sensitively address specific readers.1.1 Conveys real-world problems in ways that pique reader interest.Provide examples of real-world problems and persuade readers of their importance.
1.2 Interprets technical data and findings in ways that can be understood by non-technical audiences.

Explain the meaning of the data using words that a high school graduate would understand.

Explain the meaning of the data using words that a (cross-professional) clinical colleague would understand.

1.3 Interprets data using accurate field-specific terminology.When writing about a particular population or group, use terminology that the community uses to describe themselves or terms that the group prefers.
1.4 Demonstrates cultural sensitivity and avoids alienating audiences by anticipating the impact of word choices on different populations.

When technical terms are used, define these terms in language that a person unfamiliar with the field would understand.

Describe the physiological and psychological evidence for the finding.

2. Describe processes, sites, and data.2.1 Is precise: describes data/sites accurately and objectively.

Accurately describe data using objective terms.

Emphasize the importance of using specific details and terminology to ensure a clear understanding of the subject matter.

2.2 Is concise: avoids providing superfluous details.

Provide concise descriptions by focusing on relevant and essential information.

Discourage the inclusion of unnecessary or excessive details that may detract from the main point or overwhelm the reader.

2.3 Contains accurate information.

Stress the significance of fact-checking and ensuring that descriptions are based on accurate and reliable information.

Encourage students to critically evaluate their sources and verify the credibility of the data or information they present.

2.4 Write descriptions that reflect understanding of scientific foundations.

Encourage students to demonstrate their understanding of key principles, theories, or research findings when describing processes, sites, or data, which include:

  • Accurate and comprehensive use of
    terminology: Students should use discipline-specific terminology appropriately and accurately, indicating a deep understanding of the scientific concepts and theories in SLHS.
  • Integration of research findings: Students should incorporate relevant research findings and studies into their writing, demonstrating an understanding of the current scientific literature in the field. They should be able to critically analyze and synthesize research to support their arguments or discussions.
  • Application of theoretical frameworks: Students should apply theoretical frameworks or models in their writing to explain phenomena or guide their analysis. They should demonstrate an understanding of how theories and concepts are applied in practical contexts within SLHS.
  • Understanding of research methods: Students should demonstrate familiarity with research methods commonly used in speech-language-hearing sciences. They should be able to discuss the strengths and limitations of different research designs and methodologies, as well as interpret and evaluate research findings.
3. Make a
persuasive recommendation.
3.1 Supports recommendations with pertinent scientific, economic, or sociocultural perspectives.

Support a recommendation with multiple pieces of evidence.

Emphasize the importance of using credible sources and research findings to support their arguments.

3.2 Demonstrates critical thinking and logical reasoning.Guide students in presenting persuasive recommendations by employing critical thinking skills and logical reasoning.
Encourage them to anticipate and address counterarguments, providing sound justifications for their recommendations.
4. Make and provide evidence for claims.4.1 Provides a testable thesis idea/statement or claim.

The thesis or claim should be specific, arguable, and provide a basis for further analysis or investigation.

A substantive thesis goes beyond established facts or findings and delves into exploring new perspectives, challenging existing theories, or investigating gaps in the current knowledge.

Students to go beyond providing simple summaries or conclusions that are readily confirmed by existing research literature. Instead, they should strive to develop more complex and narrow research questions that lead to more engaging and thought-provoking discussions.

4.2 Substantiates claims and/or conclusions with adequate evidence.Assess the extent to which students support their claims and conclusions with relevant and sufficient evidence.
4.3 Utilizes credible sources to substantiate claims.Use of reputable and reliable sources that contribute to the credibility and persuasiveness of the claims.
4.4 Presents persuasive arguments and analysis.Present compelling arguments and analysis based on the evidence provided, demonstrating critical thinking and logical reasoning.
4.5 Moves beyond description to analyze or interpret data or finding.Provide thoughtful insights, explanations, and connections that extend beyond surface-level observations.
4.6 Synthesizes disparate perspectives or chronological findings found in primary data.Analyze and compare contrasting viewpoints, identify common themes or patterns, and provide a comprehensive synthesis of the information.
4.7 Includes and explains visuals (figures, charts, tables) in enough detail that they convey meaning when viewed apart from surrounding text.

Has axis labels and units. 

Being able to explain what the axes correspond to. 

Uses correct scaling and appropriate numeric precision. 

Being able to translate between graph and description, or between description and graph. 

Has informative and concise figure caption.

Differentiate between describing a visual (what it literally shows) and what it means (what we learn from the data).

4.8 Incorporates visuals that have been correctly scaled.

Visuals they include in their writing are appropriately scaled and accurately represent the data or information being conveyed.

Proper scaling helps to maintain the integrity and accuracy of the visuals.

4.9 Demonstrates the ability to select relevant sources.Choose appropriate and relevant sources that align with their claims and insights.
4.10 Integrates unambiguous
citations.

Only citing legitimate peer-reviewed sources versus random opinions 

Citing original/primary sources rather than aggregations/review articles/second-hand citations. 

Having consistent formatting of references, following some established guideline (e.g. APA). 

Make it unambiguous which reference corresponds to each exact point (i.e. don’t report A, B, C, and then cite
X, Y, Z; report A(X), B(Y), C(Z)).

4.11 Incorporates appropriate and credible data.

Students should demonstrate their ability to select relevant and credible sources that support their claims and insights.

They should provide accurate and unambiguous citations to give credit to the original sources of data or information.

5. Organize contents logically.5.1 Organizes text based on scientific processes and categories.

(a) Papers will include separate sections for analysis, results, and discussion.

(b) Analysis, results, and discussion sections will not duplicate information.

 5.2 Discriminates between empirical and theoretical evidence.Papers’ summaries of empirical evidence will be veridical, and not based on notions of how the evidence ‘should’ behave.
 5.3 Facilitates logical
comprehension and idea
evolution.
For different genres, papers will follow the organizational template provided in the writing assignment.
 5.4 Summarizes consistencies and inconsistencies in previous studies.

For an empirical study: in writing up summaries of empirical evidence, papers will refer to all of the relevant data, and not to subsets of data that are chosen to illustrate a particular point of view.

For a literature review: in writing up summaries of prior studies, students will summarize the consistencies and inconsistencies in previous studies, and not just those that accord with one another.

6. Revise and proofread.6.1 Writes paragraphs that cohere logically.Follow the guidelines in the grading rubric that has been supplied with the writing assignment [requires willingness to share rubric].
6.2 Demonstrates command of standard grammar and punctuation.Papers will follow [a grammar and punctuation guide that is publicly accessible].
6.3 Uses well-constructed sentences.The individual sentences that comprise a piece of writing should follow [a grammar and punctuation guide that is publicly accessible].

 

Highlights from the Writing Plan

For the 2024–2026 period, SLHS plans to undertake a comprehensive set of initiatives to enhance writing instruction and assessment across the curriculum. The first major objective is to conduct curricular mapping to align the menu of writing criteria with writing assignments and activities across SLHS courses. This will ensure that writing assignments are effectively integrated into the curriculum and aligned with the desired writing abilities. This mapping will be coordinated with the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee and the WEC team to implement a sequenced and laddered approach to writing instruction. This ladder system ensures that writing skills are progressively developed, refined, and aligned with students’ learning outcomes throughout the curriculum. This leads to integrating these skills into the required capstone project and presentation at the end of the program.

To enhance the quality of writing instruction, faculty members and instructors in SLHS will enhance grading practices and feedback mechanisms by implementing structured feedback methods aligned with departmental writing criteria. Workshops will be crucial in this process, providing opportunities for faculty and TAs to share best practices and strategies for effective writing instruction and assessment. These workshops will include tutorials on using grading tools available on Canvas, sessions for mutual critique and support in revising rubrics, and discussions on integrating writing activities into various courses. Workshops will provide professional development opportunities to focus on increasing consistency in grading, improving grading efficiency, providing constructive feedback, enhancing TA support, and utilizing writing instruction techniques effectively.

As an outcome of these regular professional development opportunities, faculty will develop and provide clear and consistent rubrics for each writing assignment based on the established criteria and grading guidelines. These rubrics will provide a consistent framework for evaluating student writing, ensuring fairness and clarity in grading practices. In addition to formal writing assignments with detailed, clear, and consistent rubrics, integrating teaching and learning with writing through in-class writing activities will be emphasized to enhance student engagement, reinforce learning, and provide practical writing experience. The department has already launched an SLHS Writing Plan Canvas course, accessible to all instructors, to facilitate the exchange of ideas and share course materials and instructional strategies.